Skip to content

Conversation

petrochenkov
Copy link
Contributor

Follow up to #74967

@rust-highfive
Copy link
Contributor

r? @davidtwco

(rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override)

@rust-highfive rust-highfive added the S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. label Dec 2, 2020
@davidtwco
Copy link
Member

@bors r+

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Dec 3, 2020

📌 Commit 908bf5a has been approved by davidtwco

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Dec 3, 2020
bors added a commit to rust-lang-ci/rust that referenced this pull request Dec 4, 2020
Rollup of 11 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - rust-lang#77686 (Render Markdown in search results)
 - rust-lang#79541 (Doc keyword lint pass)
 - rust-lang#79602 (Fix SGX CI)
 - rust-lang#79611 (Use more std:: instead of core:: in docs for consistency)
 - rust-lang#79623 (Pass around Symbols instead of Idents in doctree)
 - rust-lang#79627 (Update cargo)
 - rust-lang#79631 (disable a ptr equality test on Miri)
 - rust-lang#79638 (Use `item_name` instead of pretty printing for resolving `Self` on intra-doc links)
 - rust-lang#79646 (rustc_metadata: Remove some dead code)
 - rust-lang#79664 (move interpret::MemoryKind::Heap to const eval)
 - rust-lang#79678 (Fix some clippy lints)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 0fbbe94 into rust-lang:master Dec 4, 2020
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.50.0 milestone Dec 4, 2020
@petrochenkov petrochenkov deleted the inclean branch February 22, 2025 18:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants